• 14 October, 1999Counting since:
  • 944457Total site visitors:
  • 43Visitors today:
  • 0Visitors currently online:
  • 390Visitors to this post:

Current Moon Phase

La Lune

My Tweets

Upcoming Holidays

  • Mon, May 27
    • Memorial Day
    • Memorial Day
  • Thu, May 30
    • Ascension Day
  • Sun, Jun 9
    • Pentecost
  • Mon, Jun 10
    • 12a - Phillip's birthday
    • Whit Monday

Subscribe to the Journal

Enter your email address to subscribe to Erin's Journal and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Member of The Pagan Webcrafter's Association. The RSS feed for this site!
HomeReviews True Magick

True Magick


by Amber K.
Llewellyn Publications, 1990
ISBN 0-87542-003-6

Review by Daven

Rating: ★★★☆☆ 

True Magick is an interesting read, if you are reading it as a basic introduction to Wiccan Magick.

Amber K. does a good job of presenting her philosophies and thoughts, injunctions and warnings in a coherent fashion, allowing the reader to understand how certain things are working and why they are happening.

I believe, however, that the failure of this book is that Amber tries to make it a text for ALL magick and it does not work. She presents a brief (one paragraph to one page) descriptions of other magickal paths, and she implies that what she lays down in this book applies to these paths as well. The rules for Wiccan Magick do not apply to Alchemy and never have.

I’m going to go on this facet for a bit to allow the reader of this review to see where the differences are.

The thoughts on the Rede and not harming none only apply to Wiccan magick. In every other tradition of magick out there, there is no such injunction. There may be similar feelings, but it is assumed that you understand what will happen if you decide to go on with the spell despite what might happen as a consequence.

Although Amber K implies that Invocation of the Goddess is a requirement for all systems of magick, it is not used in the Enochian system, Rosicrucian system, or the system laid out in the Keys of Solomon.  In fact, not all Theurgical systems even work with a Goddess at all.

It is the same story for the Directions, the Elements, the Spirits, the magickal process itself. The timing of magick which Amber goes into says that the Full/New Moon as well as the days of the week are what is important, when in the Greater Key of Solomon, there is no mention of the moon (again that I am aware of), but quite a complete section dealing with the planetary hours.

Now, I am NOT saying that this book is completely bad. There is a lot in it that is good and worth the purchase price. But it is NOT the be-all, end-all of magick that is implied. The ONE disclaimer that I remember seeing talking about this was so brief that one could quickly pass it by and never register that she is speaking not for the more traditional magickal systems.

However, as a work on Wiccan Magick, it rocks. There is clear descriptions of the morals relating to Wiccan Magick, the processes that one should go through to do spells, the consequences and the injunctions against using magick for personal profit. “You may as well throw your wand down a well if you charge (money)”, she states in regards to Wiccan magick.

Other than the one huge complaint of trying to be too much the one tome of magick that there is, I have really no complaint with this book. She lays it out in such a way that anyone could understand the concepts involved and the needed materials and disciplines.

All in all, as a book on Wiccan Magick, I give it 4 1/2 stars out of 5. However, because she never states that this is the magickal system she is focusing on, I am forced to give this 3 starts out of 5. Thankfully anyone who is at all familiar with other magickal systems will be able to spot this bias fairly easily.

Originally posted 2009-11-15 18:37:44. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Print This Post Print This Post

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>